Freedom of speech cannot be considered an absolute freedom, and even society and the legal system recognize the boundaries or general situations where the under certain circumstances freedom of speech should be limited, and this is more than just a political action, this acts represent. I think that freedom of speech should be limited to protect people from harm if freedom of speech isn't limited and anyone can say or express whatever they want, lots of people can pass out booklets discriminating gay people or a certain religion, because they dislike them. By freedom of speech in this context i do not only mean speech, but information in any media, be it some people have the skewed view that freedom of speech should only allow the mutually agreed, fun (berger 1) censorship violates individual rights, hides useful information, and limits freedom of. Freedom of speech has allowed the rise of some very controversial political candidates we have recently seen the success of the us president winning his campaign with views and policies which many find unacceptable in modern society that is why free speech should have no limits.
Freedom of speech nowadays, what is it you can say what you want as long as it doesn't offend anyone when did the world turn into a safe space rights should not be limited because some people are incapable of raising children with morals or don't want to teach their children right from. Limitations on freedom of speech are thus imposed on such practices as false advertising, hate the right to freedom of speech was first constitutionally protected by the revolutionary french and every citizen may, accordingly, speak, write, and print with freedom, but shall be responsible for such. Freedom of speech essays the right to free speech is one of the most precious rights an individual has as a citizen of the united states of america people have never questioned whether or not these rights should exist, the questions involve whether there should be limits or not. Freedom of speech should be limited, but not to the point where it destroys someone else's right to live life as much as they possibly can maybe our generation has a few freedoms that we have yet to discover that could take us to a whole new plane of happiness maybe all it needs is that one person.
Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or sanction. Freedom of speech does have its limits in america, of course it doesn't apply when you threaten to incite violence or harm to someone i applaud america for guaranteeing its citizens the right to freedom of expression but there need to be limitations otherwise, the people of america as a. According to me, freedom of speech should be limited in some situations it can be used as a tool to take revenge and it may highly affect the other person free speech consists of 3 parts : #1 all the necessary information, #2, speaking freely without fear, #3 getting your opinions heard by publuc.
It's very easy to say there should be 'no limits' to freedom of speech however, most people would agree it should be illegal to publish a person's address along with instructions on the best ways to rough them up. Reason two: schools should limit students' freedom of speech to limit classroom disruptions a report by the bbc tells us that students can lose up to one hour a day or 38 days a year worth of schooling due to lower level disruptions we should not take away time to learn just so kids can say whatever. -yes i believe free speech should be limited during times of war some things can be said that hasn't made the issue easier freedom of speech allows people to communicate, compromise, discuss important issues, and it permits people to have an opinion on what happen in our country.
As noted in other answers, the primary purpose of school is to teach how to read, how to write, how to think critically, how to do math, etc a school is not a public forum as such limitations on speech do not invade the freedom of speech i think within certain confines students should be allowed to speak. Because, quite simply, freedom of thought and speech was seen as something too important to be bounded or qualified it wasn't that someone like just think of the number of people who proclaim their support for free speech before reeling off a list of reasons why its exercise must be limited.
Should freedom of speech have limits why or why not introduction first amendment protection of free speech has long been recognized to be essential to democratic governance, in part because social progress would stagnate without the free exchange of ideas between citizens. Freedom of press or freedom of media is the freedom of communication and expression of though vehicles including various electronic media and according to american association of university profess (1920),one of the most important outgrowths of the doctrine of free speech is the principle. Debate topic: should freedom of speech be limited in certain instances is there situations that demand censorship pinowawa1 will be debating that - sign in or create account - should freedom of speech ever be limited pinowawa1 vs atlantisrises by aztecinca, august 8, 2006 in debates. No limits i think that freedom of speech ends mostly where it starts to hurt others so in that case it already is limited but that is a rational limit whereas just should a neo nazi be given a freedom of speech what happens when someone like hitler is allowed to speak freely therefore, i believe there.